Monday, March 31, 2008

Random Thought For The Week

Is it odd to anyone else that at the same time Subway is honoring the 10 year anniversary of Jared losing all that weight while eating their healthy subs they are also running a special on their footlongs, selling them for only $5?

I thought that part of eating healthy (which they're advertising through the Jared commercials) was by eating smaller portions (defeated by selling cheaper footlongs).

Maybe it's just me.

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Sad To Say, They Weren't

I closed out my post o' frustration (yet ultimate triumph) yesterday with the hope that other county conventions went better. According to this article in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, some went worse.

Perhaps it is time to take a serious look at how we conduct our politics as Democrats in Texas. It's clear, at any rate, that something needs to be done.

Saturday, March 29, 2008

A Cause To Convention For

So, today was the Democratic County Convention. If you'll recall from an earlier post, I was elected as a delegate for Senator Obama from my precinct to the County Convention, so this morning I woke up, looked up the directions to the Middle School it was being held at online, and left early, so as not to be late.

It's a good thing I left a little early, because I discovered that the directions I had found online from the MapQuest people were completely wrong (is it possible MapQuest is run by Republicans? Who can say for sure). Luckily I found it some thirty minutes after I should have, but having left early, I arrived on time.

Confusion reigned upon entering the building, luckily someone who had already been around had come out to her car to get something, so myself and a lady who arrived at the same time were able to follow her to the gym (on the opposite side of the school) where the convention was being held.

Side Bar - While I was driving around trying to find the Middle School I found the place where the Republican County Convention was being held. Do you know how I know? They had signs. We're the party of the New Deal, you'd think we could figure out to have signs.

Anyway, finally, I was signed in as an Obama Delegate for the 9th Precinct and I made my way to the table for my precinct where I was greated by the other delegates who I had befriended way back on March 4th (which seems so long ago now).

The Convention got under way and we learned that each precinct or group of precincts (some of the smaller ones had been combined) would get to choose 1 delegate and 1 alternate delegate.

If you recall from that earlier post, our precinct had sent 5 Delegates for Obama (myself being one of them) and 9 Delegates for Clinton. This didn't look good for my being chosen a Delegate to the State Convention.

Three of us wanted to be the Delegate (myself included) and we all had one vote. One person got only one vote (having voted for herself) and that left 13 total votes between two people. I lost by one vote. I feel pretty good about this, however, considering that there were only 5 Obama delegates. Instead I was chosen as an Aternate for the State Convention.

However, I was disturbed by the way this was handled, considering that I knew about 65% of the county had voted for Clinton, I assumed that most precincts would be split that way as well, meaning that every precinct might elect a Clinton delegate. This wouldn't be a true representation of how the county had voted. I was very uneasy about this as were others in my precinct. After each of the precinct Delegates were named it turned out that of the twelve Delegates, only two were for Obama. This is nowhere close to the correct percentage that our county should have been sending.

(This is what prompted my Facebook message about being an alternate but having a problem with the process.)

Someone at our table had a booklet of the County and State Convention rules, however, and let me borrow them to try and ease my ill feeling, by at least knowing that we had done it right even if it seemed unfair based on how Democratic Delegates were normally parcelled out.

As I read through the pages and pages of non relevent material, the Nomination Committee was meeting to elect five At Large Delegates. About the same time I heard about this I got to the portion in the rules about the At Large Delegates.

The rules stated (I'm paraphrasing, because I had borrowed the rules, I don't actually have them in front of me at the moment) that the purpose of the Nominating Commitee was to alocate the At Large Delegates in order to reflect send a correct number of each delegates to the State Convention based on the percentage of votes taken when we signed in.

That meant that they would use the five at large delegates to rectify the inproportionate number of Delegates that Clinton was currently recieving.

I felt relieved. This made sense to me.

I wasn't relieved for long as the Nominating Commitee came back with their five At Large Delegates. The percentage for Clinton had actually grown larger.

People throughout the crowd were getting angry. I stepped up to the table at the front where the Convention Chair and other Convention officials were seated. One person was trying to quiet down the audience the others looked at me as I took a seat next to the table. I voiced my concerns and told them what I had read in the rules and how I thought that meant they were supposed to use the five At Large spots to get the percentage close to the percentage with which we had voted. I was told that they had done that. I asked to see the numbers, because I didn't believe that the people there had voted at such a percentage to get Clinton 14 Delegates to only 3 for Obama. They told me no. They said it was done and they were about to take a vote to accept the At Large Delegates as they had nominated them.

Other people had crowded towards the table and were hearing what I had to say, and I was starting to win some converts. A couple of the Convention officers asked me to come with them outside so we could talk about it without all of the noise and people crowding up on us. I went with them and calmly made my case. I said I wanted to see the percentages and if they matched up I would stop my complaint. One of them admitted to me that the Nomination Commitee hadn't actually looked at the percentages of votes from the Delegates.

I calmly re-read the pertinant portion of the rules explaining what the At Large Delegates were intended to do. All the while I wanted to be yelling at them for screwing this up so badly. We wouldn't have been in this position if they had just followed the rules in the first place. I felt that my point would be better made if I kept my cool, however, and I am proud to say that I did so.

The Convention Officers agreed that the numbers needed to be looked at.

We went back into the gym where I was horified to discover that in my absence they had called the matter to vote and apparently skipped over any discussion about it. I tried to speak my point, but the man with the microphone kept saying "We've called it to vote, we can only accept the motion or deny the motion."

Now keep in mind that well over 60 percent of the people there were for Hillary Clinton and by accepting the Nominations as entered they would have won her more Delegates.

I and others kept voicing our displeasure with this move, but the man at the microphone would not be swayed. He called to vote. Finally I had to hope that right would win out.

It did, by two votes the motion was denied. Someone called a motion to discuss the issue that we had, and finally, I was handed the microphone.

At this point, my hand's were shaking and I was very, very pissed, but I managed to keep my cool. I explained my position, re-read the rules to everyone there and simply asked that we get a percentage and then let the Nomination Commitee refigure the five At Large Delegates.

I got a large ovation.

Someone went and got the numbers and told us that of the 215 Delegates at the County Convention, 67 of them had pledged for Obama and 148 had pledged for Clinton. That meant that Obama should get roughly 31% of the Delegates and Clinton should get 69%.

As it was, Clinton was getting 82% and Obama was getting 18%. Now did people understand why I had a problem?

The Nomination Commitee agreed to remeet and the numbers were fixed with Obama getting 3 of the 5 at large Delegates meaning that he was recieving 29% of the Delegates (as close as we could get to 31% as giving him 4 of the 5 would have meant him getting 35% which would have been unfair to Clinton.)

There were some people there who were very upset that I made such a big deal about the whole thing, but for the most part people were very supportive, Clinton supporters as well as Obama supporters, people who thanked me for standing up for what was right despite all the anger it caused originally (as well as the anger some people no doubt still feel towards me, one woman in a Hillary shirt got my name so that she could let others no what I had done. She said this as if that were a bad thing, I told her that I hoped others could learn what I had done as I was rather proud of it. Well, I had been a good sport through most of this, I felt like I deserved that moment.)

What upsets me is the Nomination Commitee and their attempt to pass off their first list of At Large Delegates. I will choose to believe that they did so in ignorance, being unaware of the rules, and not in order to win more Delegates for their Candidate (only one member of the Nomination Commitee supported Barack Obama).

Either way though, I am very disappointed in their actions and glad that I had the guts to stand up for the rules.

The whole situation gave me a massive Migraine and I'm still a little shaken up by it all, but I figured I might feel better if I told the story, so here it is. I hope that other county conventions went smoother.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Never Thought I Would Say This, But Thank You Mike Huckabee

The big political news in regards to retrospective reflections backed Democratic Presidential canditate Barack Obama is the release of some of the sermons of his former pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

I've struggled with this, and haven't written about it before because the fact that this is even an issue angers me. It angers me to the point that I can't write about it coherently, it's much easier for me to resort to yelling at the racism of the media covering the issue, other candidates responses, and the stand my alma mater (TCU) took on the issue (which angers me the most). I would like to take a moment to give thanks to Brite Divinity School for their stand on the issue, refusing to back down on their desire to reward Rev. Wright for his 40 years of service to the African American community despite some "disturbing comments". Comments, I feel compelled to add, that if you are going to disparage you should at least look at them in regards to the sermons in full and not just on a YouTube video with the "offensive" comments taken completely out of context.

Before I start yelling incoherently again, let me get to the point of this post, normally I give you a quote of the day from a specific web based location, but today's quote of the day is one that I chose specifically instead of randomly.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

As easy as it is for those of us who are white to look back and say, "That's a terrible statement," I grew up in a very segregated South, and I think that you have to cut some slack. And I'm going to be probably the only conservative in America who's going to say something like this, but I'm just telling you: We've got to cut some slack to people who grew up being called names, being told, "You have to sit in the balcony when you go to the movie. You have to go to the back door to go into the restaurant. And you can't sit out there with everyone else. There's a separate waiting room in the doctor's office. Here's where you sit on the bus." And you know what? Sometimes people do have a chip on their shoulder and resentment. And you have to just say, I probably would too. I probably would too. In fact, I may have had ... more of a chip on my shoulder had it been me.
- Mike Huckabee, offering his perspective on the preaching of Rev. Jeremiah Wright

Mike Huckabee and I disagree on a great many things, but on this we are in step. He says it as well as I could hope to myself.

Thank you Mike Huckabee, thank you.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Ivy League Meets Hogwarts

Harry Potter is being studied in a class at Yale, amongst other schools according to this article on CNN.com.

This doesn't surprise me at all, and I fully expect this to be a trend that continues throughout higher education everywhere simply because J.K. Rowling's books are so deep and textured. Yes, they are books geared towards children (especially the first couple) but there is so much more going on in these touching and brilliant tales.

I, for one, would definately take one of these classes if offered.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Are You a Beer Drinker or a Wine Drinker?

Today's Quote of the Day...

Reminds me of my safari in Africa. Somebody forgot the corkscrew and for several days we had to live on nothing but food and water.
-W.C. Fields

Well, we can safely assume that if W.C. Fields were still alive today, he, as a wine drinker, would be voting Democratic.

How do I know? A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll of course.

Anyway, thought you might find that interesting. I wonder if they had done a further survey about the types of beers people drink if the McCain numbers would have been consistant throughout all of them. I'm betting not.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Money, Money, Money, Money

Today's Quote of the Day

A bank is a place that will lend you money if you can prove that you don't need it.
-Bob Hope

While our President acknowledges that the Economy is facing "challenging times" more and more people are suffering far more then just some challenging times as more and more people are facing the very real possibility of losing their homes.

Not to worry though, Washington Mutual execs can still expect to recieve their bonuses.

Some things make me literally sick.